Divorce Information

Alienation of Affection - Interference with marriage can cost big bucks in North Carolina


Non-lawyers are often surprised to learn that a spouse can sue for money damages in North Carolina based on allegations of emotional harm caused by a third party to the marital relationship. These lawsuits for "alienation of affection" and/or "criminal conversation" are usually brought by the innocent spouse against the guilty spouse's lover; but an alienation action may also be brought against someone like an in-law or other near relative who has advised a defecting spouse to leave the marital relationship. There is a three year statute of limitation for criminal conversation and alienation of affection, pursuant to N.C.G.S. Section 1-52(5). This statute starts on the date that alienation occurred, which is determined by a court on a case-by-case basis.

Fairly high-dollar awards in such cases have existed here for a number of years, a fact not generally known. As long ago as 1926, for instance, a jury in Macon County rendered a verdict in the amount of $12,000 against the lover of plaintiff's wife. A 1931 jury in Forsyth County held against plaintiff wife's father-in-law for $38,000. A Rowan County jury awarded $30,000 against a husband's girlfriend in 1969. In 1982, our Court of Appeals affirmed a jury verdict in the amount of $25,000 in compensatory damages and another $25,000 in punitive damages. A 1990 Forsyth County jury award of $300,000 in punitive damages for alienation was sustained on appeal, even though the court struck the compensatory award for $200,000.

In the past several years, however, North Carolina juries have become even more generous, in 1997 alone handing down $1.2 million against a female paramour in Forsyth County and awarding another jilted wife $1 million in Alamance County and a deceived husband $243,000 in Wake County. In late 1999, a judge in Durham County valued compensatory damages in a case brought by a husband against his wife's lover at less than $3,000 in compensatory damages but the judge still awarded $40,000 in punitive damages on the criminal conversation claim. Since our Supreme Court refused to abolish these causes of action in 1984 and since our legislature has also shown no strong interest in doing so since that time, sizeable damage awards remain a real possibility in North Carolina. At the present time, more than 200 alienation actions are filed in an average year.

Conduct after date of separation

The date of separation is an important date in alienation of affection and criminal conversation cases. Our courts have decided that conduct that occurs before the date of separation is relevant to these types of actions. This is because a claim of alienation of affection must prove that, among other things, the defendant's malicious conduct contributed to or caused the loss of affection in the marriage. The parties to the marriage must still be together in order to prove this claim. It is important to note, however, that conduct which occurs after the date of separation may also be considered by a judge, if that conduct corroborates the conduct that occurred before the date of separation. In criminal conversation actions, by contrast, post-separation conduct is even more important. Conduct which occurs after the date of separation can be considered by a court to not only corroborate behavior that occurred before the date of separation, but is enough on its own to maintain an action for criminal conversation.

North Carolina is in the minority

The existence of continuing cases of this sort in North Carolina appears to surprise lawyers and residents in many other states because we are now in a very small minority of jurisdictions -- including Hawaii, Illinois, Mississippi, New Mexico, South Dakota and Utah -- which still recognize both alienation of affection and criminal conversation. As of July 2003, 43 states and the District of Columbia had abolished the cause of action for alienation of affection. The states vary widely in the way they deal with this issue: in some states, only one of the two causes of action continues to exist, and thus proof of the claim and/or damages have been significantly curtailed in recent years. None of these reforms has altered the stance favoring such claims in this State.

Criminal Conversation

Criminal conversation is the name for a civil lawsuit sounding in tort (a kind of injury to the person) based on sexual intercourse between the defendant and the plaintiff's spouse. Criminal conversation is something like a "strict liability tort" because the only things the plaintiff has to prove are (1) an act of intercourse and (2) the existence of a valid marriage between the plaintiff and the adulterous spouse, and (3) the bringing of the lawsuit within the applicable statute of limitations. For all practical purposes, there are no obvious defenses to a timely claim for criminal conversation, provided the plaintiff can prove a valid marriage and intercourse between the defendant and plaintiff's spouse. It is not a defense that: the defendant did not know the other person was married, that the person consented to the sex, that the plaintiff was separated from his or her spouse, that the other person actually seduced the defendant, that the marriage was an unhappy one, that the defendant's sex with the spouse did not otherwise impact on the plaintiff's marriage, that plaintiff had mistreated the spouse, or that the plaintiff had also been unfaithful. It might be a defense that the plaintiff "consented" to the illicit intercourse; but defendant would have to show that this approval or encouragement had pre-dated the extramarital conduct.

Alienation of Affection

An action for alienation of affection, on the other hand, does not require proof of extramarital sex. Despite this difference, an alienation claim tends to be more difficult to establish because it is comprised of more elements and there are some additional defenses. To succeed on an alienation claim, the plaintiff has to show that (1) the marriage entailed love between the spouses in some degree; (2) the spousal love was alienated and destroyed; and (3) defendant's malicious conduct contributed to or caused the loss of affection. It is not necessary to show that the defendant set out to destroy the marital relationship, but only that he or she intentionally engaged in acts which would foreseeably impact on the marriage. Thus, defendant has a defense against an alienation claim -- but not to a claim for criminal conversation -- where it can be shown that defendant did not know that the object of his or her affections was in fact married. As with a criminal conversation action, it is not a defense that the non-innocent spouse consented to defendant's conduct. But it might be a defense that the defendant was not the active and aggressive seducer. If defendant's conduct was somehow inadvertent, the plaintiff would be unable to show intentional or malicious action. But prior marital problems do not establish a defense unless such unhappiness had reached a level of negating love between the spouses.

Criticism of these laws

Critics of such laws call them obsolete methods for legislating morality (despite the fact that most criminal laws could be said to legislate morality). Critics also say the laws do not fulfill their purpose of protecting marital relationships, inequitably punish only one of two guilty parties, and serve as an excuse for blackmail or forced settlements. The critics add that such suits can also be misused by embittered spouses seeking vengeance against a third party interferer and that injured spouses cannot possibly be compensated for a lost marriage. On the other hand, defenders point to the virtual non-existence of criminal prosecutions for adultery in current American culture, a need to uphold the sanctity of the marriage vows through some kind of formal legal sanction for violation of marital promises, and the potential deterrence of rampant extramarital affairs by means of the threat of monetary damage suits. Defenders also point out that adultery has a very long history of illegality; and that it is therefore appropriate for the civil laws of criminal conversation and alienation of affections to perpetuate Western culture's longstanding disapproval, by law and by custom, of extramarital affairs.

Whether one thinks it is a good or a bad situation for North Carolina to continue to recognize such claims by spouses claiming injury to their marriages may largely depend, then, on one's views of the need in the 1990s for protection of the marital relationship through civil litigation against the non-spouse wrongdoer and for monetary remedies for the alleged harms caused to that relationship. Indeed, some commentators have mentioned that high jury verdicts and the renewed popular interest in lawsuits for alienation of affections and criminal conversation may signal a growing societal disaffection with overly permissive sexual standards and a desire for stricter enforcement of family values. Pro-family writers believe it important that deceived spouses have litigation-oriented opportunities for vindication and that society retain this acknowledgment, however marginalized at present, of the supremacy of the institution of marriage against unwarranted intrusion. Ultimately, of course, these are all subjective and philosophical viewpoints likely to vary considerably from person to person. Visit http://www.rosen.com for more information.

Lee S. Rosen is a Board Certified Family Specialist and founder of Rosen Divorce in North Carolina. With offices in Raleigh and Charlotte, Rosen Divorce is the largest divorce firm in the Southeastern United States. Visit http://www.rosen.com for more information.


MORE RESOURCES:

The Sun

Katy Perry Divorce -- Taking Back Her Maiden Name ... Along…
TMZ.com
Katy Perry's not only keeping all the cash she made during her marriage to Russell Brand -- she's also taking back her maiden name ... according to new divorce docs. Katy's response to Russell's divorce filing -- filed yesterday and obtained by TMZ ...
Katy Perry, Russell Brand reach divorce settlementCNN (blog)
Katy Perry Signs Divorce Papers with Happy FaceRollingStone.com
Katy Perry seals divorce with a smileThe Sun
Sarasota Herald-Tribune
all 733 news articles »


Daily Gossip

Kris Humphries targets Kim Kardashian, reality TV in divorce duel
Los Angeles Times
Humphries and his divorce attorney are reportedly knocking on the doors of Kim, momager Kris Jenner and several E! executives and accusing the lot of fraud. Though Kim pulled the trigger last October and filed for divorce after only 72 days of marriage ...
Did Kim Kardashian Divorce Turn Kris Humphries Off Women Forever?Gather Celebs News Channel
Kim Kardashian wants private divorceWinnipeg Free Press
Kris Humphries talks about life after divorceDaily Gossip
Hollywood.com
all 476 news articles »


China Daily

Kim Kardashian wants private divorce
China Daily
A source said: "A public trial is the last thing that Kim wants, and she has instructed her lawyer to formally petition the court so that the divorce can be heard by a mediator, which is routinely done in California, since it's a no-fault state.
Kim Kardashian Divorce Turns Ugly -- Reality TV On TrialTMZ.com
Kim Kardashian Divorce: To Be Aired On TV?International Business Times
Kim K Wants Her Divorce Handled In Private MediationPerezHilton.com
CBS News -Ninemsn -Detroit Free Press
all 44 news articles »


Don Cornelius Upset over 'Health, Divorce, Relationships,' Son Says
Eurweb.com
I can tell you due to health, things like divorce and relationships, there's all kinds of things that may trigger a reaction like that. But as his son, as one who was really close, I can't tell you [why].” Don Cornelius, 75, who launched Soul Train in ...

and more »


E! Online

Charge against country star Rodney Atkins retired
Boston.com
1 hits “If You're Going Through Hell (Before the Devil Even Knows)'' and “Take a Back Road,'' and his wife are divorcing. Atkins said in a statement last December that his wife's accusations against him led to the divorce. Palermo says the couple is ...
Rodney Atkins avoids jail after being accused of trying to suffocate wife ...Daily Mail
Rodney Atkins' Domestic Assault Charge ClearedThe Boot

all 147 news articles »


Criminal case shadows Yuchnitz divorce trial
San Antonio Express
She has also filed for divorce from her husband of 30 years. He is charged with the solicitation of capital murder of his wife. JERRY LARA/glara@express-news.net Michael Yuchnitz sits in court after testifying at the hearing regarding control of his ...
Divorce trial begins for murder-for-hire coupleKSAT San Antonio
Yuchnitz Divorce: Michael Yuchnitz pleads the 5th to most questionsWOAI
Accused of murder-for-hire, Yuchnitz back in court for divorce hearingKENS 5 TV

all 5 news articles »


BabyCenter (blog)

Pregnant Jennifer Garner Talks Divorce
Socialite Life
“I wish I'd known to wait for marriage until I was 30 or over,” said Garner, who divorced actor Scott Foley eight years ago. “I have figured so much more out about life and feel the older women get, the more beautiful they get.
Jennifer Garner Talks Love, Marriage & DivorceCelebrity Baby Scoop
Jennifer Garner speaks out about divorce and marrying youngTheCelebrityCafe.com
Jennifer Garner's “crushing” divorceBabyCenter (blog)
Boston Herald -Huffington Post -Ology
all 86 news articles »


Daily Beast

Gay Divorce In LA: Robin Tyler & Diane Olson, First Gay Married Couple In LA ...
Huffington Post
Roughly one in every two marriages ends in divorce. So where there are gay marriages, there will be gay divorces. Unfortunately, today is a sad one for the first gay married couple in Los Angeles. Robin Tyler filed for divorce from Diane Olson on ...
Prop 8-Challenging Gay Couple Files for DivorceSlate Magazine
North Hills lesbian couple first to wed in LA County seeks divorceLos Angeles Daily News
Gay Rights 'Poster Couple' to DivorceDaily Beast
LAist -International Business Times -The Inquisitr
all 32 news articles »


Lawyers Finding Divorce App in Smart Phones
Sacramento Bee
8, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- People are using their smart phones for almost everything these days and the evidence is now following them into divorce court. A resounding 92% of the nation's top divorce attorneys say that they have seen an increase in the ...
You Know Who Really Loves Smartphones? Divorce Lawyers.All Things Digital

all 7 news articles »


Opposing Views

Courteney Cox hasn't been on a date since divorce
TheCelebrityCafe.com
The Toronto Sun reported the 47-year-old actress went on Howard Stern's Sirius XM radio show Wednesday to discuss her dating life, or lack thereof, post divorce. The former Friends star parted ways with her Dancing With the Stars contestant husband ...
Actress Courtney Cox: No Sex Since DivorceOpposing Views
Does Courteney Cox's Sex-Free Year Make Her A Virgin Again?Crushable

all 80 news articles »

Google News

home | site map buy zune zune movies comprar zune
© 2006